Sağ libertarianizm

Sağ libertarianizm,[1][2][3][4] libertarian kapitalizm,[5] yaxud sağçı libertarianizm[1][6]kapitalist mülkiyyət hüququnu, təbii ehtiyatlarınözəl mülkiyyətin bazarda paylanmasını müdafiə edən libertarian siyasi fəlsəfə.[7]

  1. 1 2 Rothbard, Murray (1 March 1971). "The Left and Right Within Libertarianism" Arxivləşdirilib 1 noyabr 2020 at the Wayback Machine. WIN: Peace and Freedom Through Nonviolent Action. 7 (4): 6–10. Retrieved 14 January 2020.
  2. Goodway, David (2006). Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-Libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. p. 4 Arxivləşdirilib 7 fevral 2024 at the Wayback Machine. "The problem with the term 'libertarian' is that it is now also used by the Right. […] In its moderate form, right libertarianism embraces laissez-faire liberals like Robert Nozick who call for a minimal State, and in its extreme form, anarcho-capitalists like Murray Rothbard and David Friedman who entirely repudiate the role of the State and look to the market as a means of ensuring social order".
  3. Carlson, Jennifer D. (2012). "Libertarianism". In Miller, Wilburn R., ed. The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America. London: Sage Publications. p. 1006 Arxivləşdirilib 7 fevral 2024 at the Wayback Machine. ISBN 1412988764.
  4. Wündisch, 2014
  5. Reiman, Jeffrey H. "The Fallacy of Libertarian Capitalism". Ethics. 10 (1). 2005: 85–95. doi:10.1086/292300. JSTOR 2380706.
  6. Newman, 2010. səh. 53 "It is important to distinguish between anarchism and certain strands of right-wing libertarianism which at times go by the same name (for example, Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism). There is a complex debate within this tradition between those like Robert Nozick, who advocate a 'minimal state', and those like Rothbard who want to do away with the state altogether and allow all transactions to be governed by the market alone. From an anarchist perspective, however, both positions—the minimal state (minarchist) and the no-state ('anarchist') positions—neglect the problem of economic domination; in other words, they neglect the hierarchies, oppressions, and forms of exploitation that would inevitably arise in laissez-faire 'free' market. […] Anarchism, therefore, has no truck with this right-wing libertarianism, not only because it neglects economic inequality and domination, but also because in practice (and theory) it is highly inconsistent and contradictory. The individual freedom invoked by right-wing libertarians is only narrow economic freedom within the constraints of a capitalist market, which, as anarchists show, is no freedom at all.
  7. Kymlicka, 2005. səh. 516: "Right-wing libertarians argue that the right of self-ownership entails the right to appropriate unequal parts of the external world, such as unequal amounts of land."